Real is not a member of the class protected by the ADA. Real failed to satisfy this threshold requirement. Because there is no such evidence in the record, we conclude Mr. Real proved that he was perceived to have an impairment that substantially limited a major life activity. In this case, the City of Compton (City) appeals from a judgment based on a jury finding that it perceived James Real then a police officer employed by City, to be disabled within the meaning of the ADA. To succeed in a claim under the ADA, a plaintiff must show that he or she suffers from a disability (real or perceived) that falls within the ambit of the statute-that is, one that substantially limits a major life activity. The definition of disability under the ADA is specific: it requires an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. In addition to protecting individuals who suffer from a disability, the ADA also protects those who have a record of disability, and those who are wrongly regarded as being disabled when they are not. § 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination against any qualified individual with a “disability” as that term is defined in the statute. This case arises under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) ( 42 U.S.C. Wolfe, Van Nuys, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Choi, Atlanta, GA., for Defendant and Appellant. Decided: August 09, 1999įranscell, Strickland, Roberts & Lawrence, Cindy S. CITY OF COMPTON, Defendant and Appellant. Investigation of the case is continuing by the District Attorney’s Bureau of Investigation and the Los Angeles County Register-Recorder/County Clerk’s Office.Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4, California.
#City of compton free#
We must do everything in our power to protect the integrity of the electorate process and to ensure that elections are free and fair.”ĭistrict Attorney Gascón said, “The people of Los Angeles County expect and deserve a government that is free of political corruption at every level.” Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón announced the charges Friday and said, “Elections are the cornerstone of our democratic nation.
In the criminal complaint, there were several pieces of evidence in the form of various text messages, mostly exchanged between Galvan and Dawson. 14, 2020, when Dawson texted Morris a link to a post with the headline “Compton Preparing to Move to an All-mail Election in 2021.” Morris later responded with enthusiasm, writing, “Dr.
The first overt act, as stated by the criminal complaint, happened on Nov. The four of them are charged with voting illegally in the election. It is also noted that Dawson was a former candidate for the Compton City Council.Ĭhaouch, Morris, Reed and Streeter were allegedly registered to vote at Dawson’s apartment in Compton, even though they didn’t live there, according to the criminal complaint. The criminal complaint states Galvan and Dawson worked together to acquire votes to be sure Galvan would keep his seat in District 2. The other four defendants will be arraigned at a later date. Galvan and Dawson were arraigned Friday in Dept. Galvan also faces a count of attempted bribery with the intent to influence an election, being accused of trying to bribe a registrar employee as she was counting ballots on election night. The criminal complaint states the six individuals “did unlawfully conspire together… to commit the crime of Election Fraud, in violation of Section 18500 of the Election Code, a felony…” Galvan, Jace Dawson, Kimberly Chaouch, Toni Morris, Barry Reed and Reginald Streeter were charged in case BA497713. Galvan won the election over challenger Andre Spicer at 855 to 854. LOS ANGELES, CA – Compton City Councilmember Isaac Galvan and five others were charged Friday for obtaining fraudulent votes in June that was ultimately decided by one vote.
0 kommentar(er)
